Blogosphere Roundup: Q Difficulty Ratings
I'm planning to compose a much longer post on the recent announcement that the Harvard Q Guide will no longer report course difficulty ratings, but in the mean time, I've rounded up a few of the insightful writers I've found around the web, with excerpts and links through to the full sources.
The Harvard Crimson: Q Guide Will No Longer Display Difficulty Score, Harris Says
A straight news piece, the Crimson article is noteworthy for including several quotes from professors defending the change:
Richard F. Thomas (Prof. Classics)
"[Difficulty ratings] could create an impulse in the instructor to make the course easier in order to attract students."
Mark C. Elliott (Prof. Chinese History)
"[Difficulty rating] is not really the most important thing about a class."
"One hopes that after everything that our students have done up to the time they get admitted to Harvard ... they recognize the value in a challenging curriculum and in taking courses that may not be an easy A, but will add in some way to their intellectual enrichment or development."
Ore Babarinsa '15 (comment on the Crimson article)
For once, sense is spoken in the comments section of the Crimson; my friend and classmate Ore speaks to a student perspective on the necessity of difficulty ratings:
I'm sorry, but the stated rationale given is completely disconnected from any understanding of how, or why many students desperately need that difficulty rating for courses on the Q quide. I've been in the hospital because of having too much academic work on my plate at Harvard, and I think the administrators need to understand that students need to be able to adequately balance the difficulty of